Hiring Virtual Assistant Can Save You a Bundle
July 7, 2008 by yelena
Filed under Working with Virtual Assistant, blog
Most VA websites I visited list saving money as one of the most important reasons for hiring a Virtual Assistant. But do the savings justify the expenses and uncertainties of switching to the outsourced solution?
For example, VANetworking.com promises savings of $60,000 per year!
A cost comparison for a full-time employee versus a Virtual Assistant
COST COMPARISON Full-timeEmployee
Virtual
AssistantHourly Rate of Pay $20.00 $35.00Fringe Benefits @ 35%(Health/Dental/Life Insurance, Retirement Plans) 7.00 NoneOverhead Rate @ 50%(Office Space, Equipment & Office Supply expense, UI Insurance, Worker’s
Compensation, Overtime Pay, Administration Costs) $10.00 NoneTotal Effective Rate of Pay $37.00 $35.00**Hours Per Year 2,080 hrs. 480 hrs.TOTAL Annual Labour Cost $76,960.00 $16,800.00
Difference = $60,160.00 per year
*Souce: Virtual Assistant Networking Association
While the numbers sound compelling, I’m not exactly sure how the rates for benefits and overhead were calculated. The time compression, from 2080 hours for an employee to 480 for a VA, is attributed to the fact that “Your employee’s 8 hour day can be crunched into 3-4 hours with a Virtual Assistant.”
So I tried to come up with my own “back of the envelope” estimates, assuming that an employee would be salaried at $35K/year, working 1864 hours/year (SWA average) and receiving benefits that amount to 30% of his base pay (US Dept. of Labor). When calculating time a VA would spend on the same tasks, I assumed that 1) an employee spends 7% of time unproductively (US Dept. of Labor) and 2) a VA would be 25% more productive (yes, I am conservative in my estimates), meaning completing 1 hour worth of work in 45 minutes.
Of course, just as I finished my calculations, I came across the 2007 Salary.com Wasting Time Survey that concludes that 63% of polled employees spent what amounted to 50 extra days of paid vacation a year browsing Internet, chatting and otherwise wasting their employer’s time. Hmm, after taking this into consideration, the total annual savings went up to $34,021!
virtual assistant, virtual assistant rates
Technorati Tags: virtual assistant, virtual assistant rates
Related posts:







flexibleasst on Mon, 7th Jul 2008 11:10 pm
Thank you for breaking this down so clearly and for listing your references! I’ve just started in the business and would like to list your blog on my own, if that’s all right with you.
Have a great day!
Rebecca
http://www.FlexibleAsst.com
http://flexibleasst.wordpress.com/
Interview with Craig Cannings of VAClassroom.com | OneClick Virtual Assistant on Fri, 24th Apr 2009 11:34 am
[...] the routine office work. Or maybe it’s because they did some math of their own or used my “back-of-the-envelope” calculations and decided that it’s more cost-effective to hire a VA than a full-time or a part-time [...]